Quenya Grammar P9: Word Order
Ordinary word order in Quenya is quite similar to English:
- The ordinary sentence order is subject-verb-object (PE17/72).
- Adjectives precede the nouns they modify (PE17/93, PM/346).
- Prepositions and relative pronouns appear at the beginning of a phrase.
Some of these rules were described by Tolkien. He stated that “the classical and normal order was expressed subject, verb, object” (PE17/72) and “Quenya preferred the (older) order in which adjectival stems preceded” (PM/346). Overall, though, Tolkien wrote very little on the topic of Elvish syntax (how words are arranged in sentences), and most of what we know is derived from examining those sentences Tolkien provided us.
In English, the function of a word is sentence is often indicated only by its position in the sentence. For example, in the sentence “the men gave the elf a knife” the subject, indirect object and direct object are indicated by their position in the sentence. If the sentence were rearranged, the meaning would change: “A knife gave the man the elf”. Quenya, however, has an advanced system of noun cases. The indirect object is indicated by the dative suffix -n: i atan anta i eldan cirma. This gives Quenya speakers more freedom to rearrange the sentence without loosing in meaning: i atan anta cirma i eldan; i eldan i atan anta cirma. A similar affect in English can be produce by using the preposition “to”: “the man gave a knife to the elf”; “to the elf the man gave a knife”.
NOTE: This freedom is even more pronounced in Classical Quenya (Parmaquesta) from before the Exile of the Noldor. This older form of the language had a distinct accusative case to mark the direct object as well: i atan anta cirmá i eldan (vs. nominative cirma). But this direct-object inflection was lost in “modern” Quenya (Tarquesta).
In general, this means word order is freer in Quenya than it is in English, and words can be rearranged for emphasis. This is especially true in poetry, where word order can be very flexible. The best example of this is the poem Namárië (Galadriel’s Lament). In the book of songs The Road Goes Ever On (RGEO), Tolkien gave both the original poem and a “prose” version in more ordinary speech order, so we can compare “poetic” and “normal” styles of speech (RGEO/58-59):
- Poem: yéni ve lintë yuldar avánier “years as swift draughts have-passed”.
- Prose: yéni avánier ve lintë yuldar “years have-passed as swift draughts”.
- Poem: an sí Tintallë Varda Oiolossëo ve fanyar máryat Elentári ortanë “for now Kindler Varda from-Everwhite like clouds her-hands Star-queen raised”.
- Prose: an sí Varda, Kindler, Star-queen ortanë máryat Oiolossëo ve fanyar “for now Varda, Tintalle, Star-queen raised her-hands from-Everwhite like clouds”.
- Poem: ar ilyë tier undulávë lumbulë “and all paths covered shadow”.
- Prose: ar lumbulë undulávë ilyë tier “and shadow covered all paths”.
- Poem: ar sindanóriello caita mornië “and from-grey-country lies darkness”.
- Prose: ar sindanóriello mornië caita “and from-grey-country darkness lies”.
The glosses in the above are mine, to render the English words in the same basic order as the Quenya ones. Note how the “prose” forms are much closer to normal English word order. The dashes in the English phrases above indicate places where a single Elvish words corresponds to multiple English words. In such agglutinated words, Quenya uses suffixes where English would uses prepositions or possessive adjectives, and these suffixes are often in the opposite order from English. Decomposing some of the Quenya words above:
- má-rya-t = “hand-her-(dual)”.
- Oio-lossë-o = “Ever-white-from”.
- sinda-nórie-llo = “grey-country-from”.
This, plus the fact that subject suffixes follow the verb, are strong indications that the basic word order in Primitive Elvish was different, in many cases the reverse of “modern” Quenya. Tolkien mentioned this specifically in the context of subject suffixes:
The normal order in [ancient] Quenya had been verb first, subject, direct object, indirect object. This survives in cases of “persons” inflexionally expressed, but the classical and normal order was expressed subject, verb, object (PE17/72).
More complex arrangements of words within Quenya sentences are explored in the entries under syntax.
Conceptual Development: Elvish syntax is a topic Tolkien rarely wrote about, but the same basic word order appeared in the Early Quenya Grammar from the 1920s: “The natural order in Qenya is (1) subject, (2) verb, (3) object of verb (PE14/56).” His only major conceptual shifts in this area was his vacillation between subject suffixes and subject prefixes; see the entry on that topic for details.
Comments
A subordinate clause…
A subordinate clause beginning with a preposition? Could you give an example?
In reply to A subordinate clause… by Lokyt
Sorry, poor choice of…
Sorry, poor choice of wording on my part. I changed it to “phrase”
it's maybe worth mentioning…
(the recipient of the action, the beneficiary, usually a noun or an emphatic pronoun)
that comes second after the direct object: Antanen parma Marko . “I gave Marko a
book .” Akárien si koa elye . “I have made you this house (and not someone else).” If the
indirect object, however, is a simple nonemphatic pronoun, then it is kept close to the
verb and it comes first: Nyaruvan tye quenta . “I’ll tell you a story .”
In reply to it's maybe worth mentioning… by Atwe
> whether the pronominal…
> whether the pronominal suffix in Quenya is an enclitic subject making the word order VSO, or has it become a fully formed conjugational suffix, and the word order is NullVO
Neither, as far as I understand syntax. Subject suffixes are fully grammaticalised conjugational endings (cf. elen alca - eleni alcar, but alcasse - alcante not *alcar-nte), but a clause with a suffixed verb is not an impersonal/subjectless clause, there is an expressed subject (though within the same word as the predicate). So the best "primitive" way to express this is IMHO something like S V O vs. V-S O.
In reply to it's maybe worth mentioning… by Atwe
Do you have an example of an…
Do you have an example of an indirect object marked only be position in Quenya? All the examples I know of have the dative suffix -n
I know this issue is discussed in Common Eldarin Noun Structure (PE21) but my reading is that those are CE patterns, not Q patterns.
In reply to Do you have an example of an… by Paul Strack
PE21 does say that some of…
PE21 does say that some of the descendant languages of CE. have retained the capability of marking the syntactic role (indirect object included) merely by the position, with no affixation. But it doesn't specify which languages those are.